<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Formula for Excess</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sciencepunk.com/2006/11/formula-for-excess/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sciencepunk.com/2006/11/formula-for-excess/</link>
	<description>Kicking ass in the name of science!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 04:23:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencepunk.com/2006/11/formula-for-excess/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2006/11/formula-for-excess/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Agreed Frank.

The BBC magazine monitor has always taken a jokey stance / sideways look at these crap &#039;marketing&#039; equations.

So I think the sciencepunk crit of the BBC is maybe a bit off the mark.

I did offer to be &#039;equation&#039; critic for BBC magazine, which would have helped the dire situation - but they didn&#039;t get back.

Maybe they were too busy preparing for Children in Need - you know: signing up 50 D list celebrities and 600 tons of baked beans for baths etc.

:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed Frank.</p>
<p>The BBC magazine monitor has always taken a jokey stance / sideways look at these crap &#8216;marketing&#8217; equations.</p>
<p>So I think the sciencepunk crit of the BBC is maybe a bit off the mark.</p>
<p>I did offer to be &#8216;equation&#8217; critic for BBC magazine, which would have helped the dire situation &#8211; but they didn&#8217;t get back.</p>
<p>Maybe they were too busy preparing for Children in Need &#8211; you know: signing up 50 D list celebrities and 600 tons of baked beans for baths etc.</p>
<p>:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencepunk.com/2006/11/formula-for-excess/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2006/11/formula-for-excess/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;Nick Allen&quot;&gt;You missed this one, by my good self, which I thought was rather good!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ah, but yours wasn&#039;t selling anything!  If only you&#039;d teamed up with Gortex, perhaps you could have been featured...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="Nick Allen"><p>You missed this one, by my good self, which I thought was rather good!</p></blockquote>
<p>Ah, but yours wasn&#8217;t selling anything!  If only you&#8217;d teamed up with Gortex, perhaps you could have been featured&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencepunk.com/2006/11/formula-for-excess/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2006/11/formula-for-excess/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>You missed this one, by my good self, which I thought was rather good!

&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4562132.stm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Do you get less wet if you run in the rain?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You missed this one, by my good self, which I thought was rather good!</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4562132.stm" rel="nofollow">Do you get less wet if you run in the rain?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencepunk.com/2006/11/formula-for-excess/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2006/11/formula-for-excess/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Oops, didn&#039;t notice you&#039;d already mentioned it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, didn&#8217;t notice you&#8217;d already mentioned it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencepunk.com/2006/11/formula-for-excess/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2006/11/formula-for-excess/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Of course, the BBC also published an article examining the phenomenon rather sceptically : http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/3794419.stm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, the BBC also published an article examining the phenomenon rather sceptically : <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/3794419.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/3794419.stm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
