<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Festival of Ann Walker (Pt. 5)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2007/06/a-festival-of-ann-walker-pt-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2007/06/a-festival-of-ann-walker-pt-5/</link>
	<description>Kicking ass in the name of science!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: coracle</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2007/06/a-festival-of-ann-walker-pt-5/#comment-1507</link>
		<dc:creator>coracle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2007/06/a-festival-of-ann-walker-pt-5/#comment-1507</guid>
		<description>Too kind!

I don't know that I'd describe the evidence for G&#38;C as nothing, a very tentative maybe and the old get-out; more research needed. Certainly not the 'overwhelming' that AW used. Echinacea certainly is nothing though.

nterestingly, googling for "Dr Ann Walker" now returns some interesting hits, with Badscience and Quackometer in positions 4 and 6 respectively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too kind!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know that I&#8217;d describe the evidence for G&amp;C as nothing, a very tentative maybe and the old get-out; more research needed. Certainly not the &#8216;overwhelming&#8217; that AW used. Echinacea certainly is nothing though.</p>
<p>nterestingly, googling for &#8220;Dr Ann Walker&#8221; now returns some interesting hits, with Badscience and Quackometer in positions 4 and 6 respectively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
