Comments on: Killing the kids: victuals for vaccinations http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2007/10/killing-the-kids-victuals-for-vaccinations/ Kicking ass in the name of science! Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:54:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Dibs http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2007/10/killing-the-kids-victuals-for-vaccinations/#comment-3934 Dibs Sat, 17 Nov 2007 15:16:08 +0000 http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2007/10/killing-the-kids-victuals-for-vaccinations/#comment-3934 Yeah, but think of all the money you could save. We could completely dispense with health care worldwide, and then we'd just have robust, healthy, highly evolved folk. Yeah, but think of all the money you could save. We could completely dispense with health care worldwide, and then we’d just have robust, healthy, highly evolved folk.

]]> By: Frank the SciencePunk http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2007/10/killing-the-kids-victuals-for-vaccinations/#comment-3923 Frank the SciencePunk Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:06:38 +0000 http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2007/10/killing-the-kids-victuals-for-vaccinations/#comment-3923 Alicia: I liked you more before you endorsed Nazi-style Social Darwinism. That was probably the most distasteful comment I've ever had on this site. Alicia: I liked you more before you endorsed Nazi-style Social Darwinism. That was probably the most distasteful comment I’ve ever had on this site.

]]> By: Alicia http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2007/10/killing-the-kids-victuals-for-vaccinations/#comment-3915 Alicia Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:30:22 +0000 http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2007/10/killing-the-kids-victuals-for-vaccinations/#comment-3915 anybody ever heard of survival of the fittest? because this is a prime example of it and I for one, believe that if the kids, or adults for that matter, die from ANY disease, then SO WHAT, because HUMANS ARE SUPPOSED TO DIE! The ones that DO live through childhood diseases and such, are the strong ones, and thus they become the ones that are successful at breeding a new stock of healthy humans . BUT, not ALL of us are supposed to make it to adulthood and we're using up the limited resources of the Earth with our ever increasing population that we have to "save" from disease. How dumb. You can't "Save" anybody from death. anybody ever heard of survival of the fittest? because this is a prime example of it and I for one, believe that if the kids, or adults for that matter, die from ANY disease, then SO WHAT, because HUMANS ARE SUPPOSED TO DIE! The ones that DO live through childhood diseases and such, are the strong ones, and thus they become the ones that are successful at breeding a new stock of healthy humans . BUT, not ALL of us are supposed to make it to adulthood and we’re using up the limited resources of the Earth with our ever increasing population that we have to “save” from disease. How dumb. You can’t “Save” anybody from death.

]]> By: Xixen http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2007/10/killing-the-kids-victuals-for-vaccinations/#comment-3514 Xixen Sun, 28 Oct 2007 20:40:04 +0000 http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2007/10/killing-the-kids-victuals-for-vaccinations/#comment-3514 "Another point to consider; If one of these parents child dies (of measles), should it be handled in the courts? If so, how - Accidental death, unlawful killing, lawful killing, natural causes?" Moreover, shouldn't the people responsible for the fear-mongering that has led to an increase in measles cases (*cough* Wakefield et al. *cough*) be held to some kind of accountability? Surely they are far more responsible than parents taken in by their spin? That's something I'd like to see; scaremongers forced to explain their position in court. “Another point to consider; If one of these parents child dies (of measles), should it be handled in the courts? If so, how - Accidental death, unlawful killing, lawful killing, natural causes?”

Moreover, shouldn’t the people responsible for the fear-mongering that has led to an increase in measles cases (*cough* Wakefield et al. *cough*) be held to some kind of accountability? Surely they are far more responsible than parents taken in by their spin? That’s something I’d like to see; scaremongers forced to explain their position in court.

]]> By: Frank the SciencePunk http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2007/10/killing-the-kids-victuals-for-vaccinations/#comment-3467 Frank the SciencePunk Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:09:42 +0000 http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2007/10/killing-the-kids-victuals-for-vaccinations/#comment-3467 <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Fumento" rel="nofollow">Michael Fumento</a> has written to me to say that <a href="http://www.fumento.com/disease/thimerosal.html" rel="nofollow">he also covered this topic recently</a>. Which I'm sure will send the conspiracy theorists among you wild. Michael Fumento has written to me to say that he also covered this topic recently. Which I’m sure will send the conspiracy theorists among you wild.

]]> By: Trevor http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2007/10/killing-the-kids-victuals-for-vaccinations/#comment-3462 Trevor Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:22:58 +0000 http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2007/10/killing-the-kids-victuals-for-vaccinations/#comment-3462 So the parents who consider themselves more qualified than doctors change their child's (probably)inherent 1:1000 chance of dying from SIDS into an overall 1:500 chance of death - well done! Could this be a modern form of natural selection? Another point to consider; If one of these parents child dies (of measles), should it be handled in the courts? If so, how - Accidental death, unlawful killing, lawful killing, natural causes? So the parents who consider themselves more qualified than doctors change their child’s (probably)inherent 1:1000 chance of dying from SIDS into an overall 1:500 chance of death - well done! Could this be a modern form of natural selection?

Another point to consider; If one of these parents child dies (of measles), should it be handled in the courts? If so, how - Accidental death, unlawful killing, lawful killing, natural causes?

]]>