<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flamingoes, police, and the illusion of safety</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2008/01/flamingoes-police-and-the-illusion-of-safety/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2008/01/flamingoes-police-and-the-illusion-of-safety/</link>
	<description>Kicking ass in the name of science!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frank the SciencePunk</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2008/01/flamingoes-police-and-the-illusion-of-safety/#comment-6807</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank the SciencePunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2008/01/flamingoes-police-and-the-illusion-of-safety/#comment-6807</guid>
		<description>It's not just the about a disinclination toward risk; it's also about accepting solutions that don't make us any safer. 

Much in the same way that flame retardant materials are probably &lt;a href="http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2007/11/the-snow-crash-conundrum/" rel="nofollow"&gt;more dangerous&lt;/a&gt; than the fires they limit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not just the about a disinclination toward risk; it&#8217;s also about accepting solutions that don&#8217;t make us any safer. </p>
<p>Much in the same way that flame retardant materials are probably <a href="http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2007/11/the-snow-crash-conundrum/" rel="nofollow">more dangerous</a> than the fires they limit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2008/01/flamingoes-police-and-the-illusion-of-safety/#comment-6806</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2008/01/flamingoes-police-and-the-illusion-of-safety/#comment-6806</guid>
		<description>Funny, I was talking about this with someone earlier today. This country is run my insurance companies. Everyone wants to cover themself and not risk their job or getting sued. Ultimately I suppose it all comes down to good old human greed.

From now on I shall refer to PCSOs as 'plastic flamingoes'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, I was talking about this with someone earlier today. This country is run my insurance companies. Everyone wants to cover themself and not risk their job or getting sued. Ultimately I suppose it all comes down to good old human greed.</p>
<p>From now on I shall refer to PCSOs as &#8216;plastic flamingoes&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2008/01/flamingoes-police-and-the-illusion-of-safety/#comment-6793</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencepunk.com/v5/2008/01/flamingoes-police-and-the-illusion-of-safety/#comment-6793</guid>
		<description>Some quick and nasty figures, as obviously this doen't include additional benfits and training costs, but a PCSO, or hobby bobby, earns a starting salary of £16 000. A proper copper earns £20 397 when they start training and £22,770 when they finish.

Now, is a PCSO two thirds as effective as a Police Officer? Clearly not....

Refs: 
&lt;a href="http://www.policecouldyou.co.uk/pcso/benefits.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;PCSO&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.prospects.ac.uk/cms/ShowPage/Home_page/Explore_types_of_jobs/Types_of_Job/p!eipaL?state=showocc&#38;idno=207&#38;pageno=2" rel="nofollow"&gt;Police Officer&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some quick and nasty figures, as obviously this doen&#8217;t include additional benfits and training costs, but a PCSO, or hobby bobby, earns a starting salary of £16 000. A proper copper earns £20 397 when they start training and £22,770 when they finish.</p>
<p>Now, is a PCSO two thirds as effective as a Police Officer? Clearly not&#8230;.</p>
<p>Refs:<br />
<a href="http://www.policecouldyou.co.uk/pcso/benefits.html" rel="nofollow">PCSO</a><br />
<a href="http://www.prospects.ac.uk/cms/ShowPage/Home_page/Explore_types_of_jobs/Types_of_Job/p!eipaL?state=showocc&amp;idno=207&amp;pageno=2" rel="nofollow">Police Officer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
